Margaret Atwood’s Alias Grace is a historical novel built around a real unsolved question: did Grace Marks kill anyone? In 1843, Grace Marks, a sixteen-year-old Irish immigrant servant, was convicted along with a stablehand named James McDermott for the murders of their employer Thomas Kinnear and his housekeeper Nancy Montgomery in Upper Canada. McDermott was hanged; Grace, after years of controversy, was eventually pardoned. Whether she was guilty, how guilty, and what she actually knew or did remains unknown. Atwood uses this uncertainty not as a problem to solve but as a condition to inhabit.
The novel is set primarily in the 1850s, when Grace is serving her life sentence in the Kingston Penitentiary. A young American doctor named Simon Jordan comes to interview her, commissioned by a group of reformers who believe she may have been wrongly convicted or who at least want her case reexamined. Jordan conducts sessions with Grace in which she tells him her life story – her childhood in Ireland, the sea crossing, her years in service, the events leading up to the murders.
Grace is a brilliant narrator of her own experience in ways that are also precisely calibrated to tell the doctor as little as possible about the thing he most wants to know. She digresses, circles, interrupts herself. She is funny, charming, and opaque. Jordan finds himself increasingly drawn to her in ways that he cannot fully understand or control, and his own parallel story – his romantic life, his professional anxieties, his unraveling during the winter he spends near Kingston – unfolds alongside Grace’s account.
The novel incorporates historical documents: newspaper accounts, trial transcripts, letters, medical case notes, poems. These documents do not clarify the historical record; they complicate it. Atwood is demonstrating that the archive does not reveal truth; it reveals the assumptions and interests of the people who created it.
Grace is one of Atwood’s great creations. She is not an innocent victim – Atwood is not interested in that argument – but she is also not a monster. She is a person of considerable intelligence and survival instinct who has spent years understanding exactly what men like Simon Jordan want from her and providing precisely enough of it to remain interesting without becoming vulnerable. Her narration is a performance, and the novel is interested in the question of whether any account of the self is anything other than performance.
The novel refuses to tell the reader whether Grace is guilty. It offers the evidence, it offers Grace’s account, and it leaves the question open. This is not a failure of nerve; it is the novel’s central argument: that we cannot know what happened, and that our desire to know is itself the thing worth examining.
Atwood researched the historical record extensively and is transparent about what she invented. The novel includes an author’s note distinguishing historical fact from fictional addition. This transparency is part of the novel’s argument about the relationship between truth and narrative: Atwood is showing her work, making visible the process by which a story becomes a story.
The novel also engages with the conditions of women’s lives in mid-nineteenth-century Canada with the precision of a social historian. The servant class, the vulnerability of women without property or family protection, the ways in which respectability and suspicion were distributed by class and gender – all of this is rendered with care and anger.
Atwood gives Grace a voice that is deceptively simple – plain sentences, careful observation, a slight formal quality that reflects Grace’s Irish-Protestant background and her years of reading in prison. The prose shifts when Atwood moves to Jordan’s perspective, becoming more educated and more anxious, more susceptible to self-deception. The contrast between the two voices is itself an argument about who has more self-knowledge.
Readers interested in historical fiction, in unreliable narration, in feminist literary history, or in Atwood’s range beyond The Handmaid’s Tale will find Alias Grace one of her most accomplished and interesting works. It is quieter than her speculative fiction and more concerned with the specific texture of the past. It rewards patient reading.
Discover
Contribute
© 2026 WritersReview · Independent Literary Criticism